Return to CreateDebate.commrk634 • Join this debate community

MRK634


Debate Info

8
11
Makes Sense Hell No
Debate Score:19
Arguments:19
Total Votes:19
More Stats

Argument Ratio

side graph
 
 Makes Sense (8)
 
 Hell No (11)

Debate Creator

bhupesh.shah(25) pic



Google Search Plus and Privacy

Makes Sense

Side Score: 8
VS.

Hell No

Side Score: 11
1 point

From a strictly business standpoint this decision does make sense. Considering the fact that the consumers have already signed up for Google+, and in the vast majority of cases most people are not important enough to even rank high in the search results to warrant a privacy concern. Google is all about providing useful information to consumers as fast as possible and this is a way to efficiently display relevant information. Sometimes consumers need to be told what they want before they want it.

Side: Makes sense
1 point

from a business perspective this has actually made life easier. Google has always been the firm that was innovative and they have done it once again here.

Side: Makes sense
1 point

From a business standpoint...

It makes sense to take the initiative to have consumers automatically exposed to all aspects of the business. Although the "invasion of privacy" is an issue, to leave an option to take part in the hands of the consumer would result in a low response.

Side: Makes sense
1 point

Whether I like it or not, agree with it or not, I can understand why Google would be doing this.

For one, by sharing privacy settings between platforms, they are streamlining their policies. This is inconvenient for users who may have different privacy settings for different platforms, but makes life easier for Google.

In terms of the allegations of anti-competitive behavior, Google likely has taken a calculated risk here. They may one day face penalties for this behavior, but in the meantime, their current set-up encourages adoption and usage of G+ and other new products amongst consumers, and definitely amongst businesses. In the end, the growth in business achieved through this strategy would probably compensate - and then some - for any future penalties they may face.

Side: Makes sense
1 point

When speaking from a business point of view I would agree with the article and how it explains why Google violating privacy is a bad thing. This is because if someone were to look up your business on Google, they would get results linking them to other people's profiles. As a result, your business will be associated with those people who may not be people you want to be associated with.

Side: Makes sense
1 point

Google is a dominant search engine which many individuals use. Google is a trusted brand and search engine which provides relevant results; making Google a leader in innovative ideas. As Google is such a dominant leader, they are using this to their advantage to promote Google Plus on their search engine. From Google's business standpoint, this makes sense. But for other businesses, such as Facebook, this is a breach of trust and privacy. Of course, Google wants to promote their new found social networking brand, but for other similar sites, this issue is causing concern.

Side: Makes sense
1 point

I believe from a business prospective that the decision makes lots of sense. Users have already made the decision and agreed to the TOS by signing up for google plus so having a uniform set of rules seems like a good idea.

Side: Makes sense
1 point

I think this makes sense is business point of view. When a company creates a social media account the whole purpose of it is to get exposure, and Gmail will give more exposure to companies. Even though there are privacy issues it gives the company a chance to get there company out there.

Side: Makes sense
1 point

Tough stance to take, as a marketer you want all the relevant information that you can get your hands on. On the other side you also dont want the bad press that comes with privacy issues. Google flexing its muscle in this way may turn some off, however these dont seem to be the people google wants to talk to anyways. Ultimately as a business I want to be able to analyze and interpret the most relevant information available to me. Google+ makes it available...

Side: Hell NO
1 point

I feel that the invasion is something that Google needs to be very sensitive about, especially when dealing with social media. From a business standpoint, the information would be usefull for Google, especially while they are designing the advertising for other companies and tailoring pages for indavidual users. However, consumers may be feeling a direct violation from this issue. Also, other companies paying for Google services may find it an unfair bias towards Google's branded social media. In order for them to not feel a negative impact, Google must be a little more careful about violating privacy rights, and practice ethical business practices.

Side: Hell NO
1 point

I think in the perspective of businesses, Google's linked information on every Google platform is beneficial to businesses. It allows businesses to connect and reach more potential customers that are interested in related products. Business are also able to track where/how individuals are accessing their site or information from Google Analytics so Google is also going all out; becoming a multi influential corporation.

Side: Makes sense
1 point

I don't believe there is anything wrong with what google is doing. They make it easier for people to search them and from a business stand point, this is a plus. By making your information more available, individuals will have more luck finding information and getting the word out on your business.

Side: Hell NO
1 point

Google has found a way to increase their range on consumers in a fast and effective way. Google gives consumers the option to opt out of the Google+ program at any time, so the consumer doesn't have to worry about a privacy issue.

What Google is really helping out with is the ability to search more and more businesses and people, with the most recent information possible.

If people are worried about privacy, don't post pictures or videos that are inappropriate

Side: Hell NO
1 point

I think the adding the Google plus search option is not considered violating privacy just because it allows consumers and business to search for related items with a sense of efficiency. People have the option of not using their google plus account when searching which should eliminate and privacy concerns.

Side: Hell NO
1 point

I do not think that Google did anything wrong, so many companies/websites do the same thing just less publicly and nobody says anything. I understand that Google is a large and very successful corporation that has a reputation and credibility to live up to, however, by adding gmail users directly to google+ some may look at it as a positive. If people chose not to use that aspect of their account they still have that option as well. A company does what is best for them to advance their success, that is all Google has done by adding Google+ into search results, I do not think that it is a violation of any terms in anyway. I think they have the authority and right to do so and decisions like these is what has led to their continued success thus far.

Side: Hell NO
1 point

Personally, I do not see a problem with Google linking Google+ pages to their search results. As Google+ is a product of Google, it only makes sense for the two products to go hand in hand, which is something users of both websites should understand.

As a highly dominant website, Google strives to make their services as relevant and helpful as possible. By signing up for a Google+ account, each user should be aware of their privacy settings, and realise the benefits of putting their information on the internet.

Overall, linking the two sites allows others to rediscover your information, while having restricted access to private posts and social settings.

Side: Hell NO
1 point

I think it is unfair to say that google search plus is violating privacy because the content it actually makes searching easier and reminds people of what they have searched for before. By combining google+ and google together, it will benefit businesses to search for potential customers that already use google and gmail. There are many other search engines on the rise as well such as Bing, and Yahoo that people could use. Google+ is smart for capitalizing on this opportunity to take advantage of their existing database.

Side: Hell NO
1 point

I don't believe Google is doing anything wrong. Without some of the information the Google shares, it allows millions of users to access important useful information that should be available. As far as Google messing with certain searches to give favorable information relative to Google, that's just wrong and breaks the rule of "freedom of search"

Side: Hell NO
1 point

I don't find any issue here in regards to Google using its search engine to promote G+ and opting in users. Google has been around for a long time now and everyone uses it and knows the capabilities and opportunities it provides. It is a dominant company and it is just using its resources and status to promote its newest service. People know that in today's day and age, information travels extremely fast, from place to place. While users should automatically assume that their personal information will NOT be shared to outsiders that they have not granted access too, they should also assume that some information will be available throughout the whole Google network.

From a business standpoint, I see this simply as a way of networking and being able to rediscover information that people already know. It gives people the ability to search other people and businesses quickly and efficiently, providing the best and most relevant results. If people are worried about privacy, don't post any personal pictures or information, or simply opt out as you have that option.

Side: Hell NO