Return to CreateDebate.commrk634 • Join this debate community

MRK634



Welcome to MRK634!

MRK634 is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


Twitter
Twitter addict? Follow us and be the first to find out when debates become popular!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS RahulDogra

Reward Points:2
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
80%
Arguments:2
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
2 most recent arguments.
2 points

Yes, Google should be held responsible. Similar to the concept of verification on websites, Google needs to understand that Montblanc pens is the only Montblanc pens. That being said, Montblanc should own any and all rights to the relevant key search words and they're the ones that should appear before counterfeits (counterfeits may be pushed but they'll always exist). Also, Google should develop a system that clearly depicts which search results are from verified sellers and push down counterfeits. Said strategy can be developed with both parties coming to an agreement. Companies like Montblanc will benefit by seeing increase in sales rather than decrease and Google will benefit by becoming a credible hub that provides links to legitimate sellers.

I do understand Google's resistance to withdraw the information requested by Montblanc but withdrawing said information will likely breach Google's AdWords contracts and besides that it's also unethical (as is counterfeiting).

Google should be held responsible.

1 point

Yes, companies should use Twitter to build engagement. However, it really should be obvious that everybody needs to be aware of what they share online. Everybody (including companies) need to be aware of the positive and possible negative feedback they may receive from a simple post. Burger King is on Twitter but nothing went wrong did it? What Burger King tends to do is advertise their current promotions. Twitter is an effective tool for every company, McDonald's needs to rethink their posts to avoid further bashing.

RahulDogra has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here